In an effort to continue our transparency and utilize the new functions of the Fandom Discuss feature, we will be reimagining Featured Article Nominations on our new forum.

As opposed to running monthly nomination threads, we will be sectioning nominations into three-month quarters. During said quarters, nominations for Featured Article will remain under consideration for the entirety of the three month duration. This allows for users to avoid resubmitting unselected articles each month, while also allowing us to consider a wider breadth of nominations.

If you wish to nominate an article for consideration, please reply to this thread as a comment and link the article you wish to nominate. Please limit three (3) submissions per user, per quarter. Articles can be reconsidered for subsequent nominations only if they were not selected in any of the previous twelve (12) calendar months.

The following articles may not be nominated due to past selection: Jamie O'Hara, Aria Jaxon, Stephanie Matsuda, Astraea Jordan, Amber Keys, TLA, & Noah Reigner.

The following are the standards by which the EWE team will select an article for our Featured Article section:

•Organization: Please ensure that your article is cleaned up, devoid of distracting spelling and grammar mistakes, and properly formatted.

•Completion: Articles should be completed with no floating headers lacking subsequent writing; please make an effort to have the article as updated as possible.

•Appropriateness: While EWE has not recently had an issue with inappropriate content being posted, articles should be respectful for various age groups, cultural backgrounds, and other groupings; offensive content will not be considered.

•Scope: The staff at EWE wishes to ensure representation for various federations and characters; diversity in this representation will be considered upon nomination.

If there are any questions or concerns with the methods of selection listed above, please contact someone from the Administrative Team. We hope to receive your nominations. Good luck to all involved!

Hello everyone. Some of you may already be aware of the situation, but for those of you who aren’t, I feel like it is necessary to bring it to everyone’s attention on this platform because you all deserve to know.

One of our bureaucrats, BrentHarvanator, is dealing with a situation where he is alleged to have sexually assaulted someone. Circumstances of this magnitude are important for the entire community to be aware of because your voice matters on whether you feel someone with this looming over him should still be bureaucrat or have any managing privileges on the EWE, a position which is essentially in control of this fandom subcategory. People have expressed the fact that they are uncomfortable using this wiki knowing the given situation and I wanted to gauge the whole community to see where you all may stand regarding whether they think Brent should be relieved of his position, as well as any positions of authority, due to the situation he is dealing with. I would also like to note that he was recently removed from the e-fed community that he was a part of for similar accusations and behavior, the same e-fed that happens to be ran by several Content Moderators on this wiki. If he can be removed from said e-fed for that particular reason, then it is logical to consider doing it here as well, especially since this is a much larger platform used by people from several different e-fed communities who also deserve a say on the matter.

If you are uncomfortable with BrentHarvanator serving as bureaucrat, admin, content moderator, and any other position of authority on EWE after being made aware of allegations against him, please note so here by saying that you approve.

If you are comfortable with BrentHarvanator serving as bureaucrat and other positions of authority on EWE after being made aware of allegations against him, please note so here by saying that you oppose.

Thank you.

UPDATE: To clarify further, this is a vote for the removal of BrentHarvanator as both bureaucrat and admin stripping him completely of power so he’s not on the board. Although the vote is based around "rumors", his pattern of similar behavior in the past coupled with this allegation makes a good portion of the community uncomfortable on top of the fact that people are unhappy with him as a bureaucrat in general as indicated by the prior thread that was made before these allegations came to light, which we wouldn’t have ended and settled had we been aware of said accusations beforehand.